# Compatibility with the real numbers of Coq
Require Import Rdefinitions Raxioms RIneq Rbasic_fun Zwf.
Require Import Epsilon FunctionalExtensionality Ranalysis1 Rsqrt_def.
Require Import Rtrigo1 Reals.
From mathcomp Require Import all_ssreflect ssralg poly mxpoly ssrnum.
From HB Require Import structures.
Set Implicit Arguments.
Unset Strict Implicit.
Unset Printing Implicit Defensive.
Import Order.TTheory GRing.Theory Num.Theory.
Local Open Scope R_scope.
Lemma Req_EM_T (
r1 r2 : R)
: {r1 = r2} + {r1 <> r2}.
Proof.
case: (
total_order_T r1 r2)
=> [[r1Lr2 | <-] | r1Gr2].
- by right=> r1Er2; case: (
Rlt_irrefl r1)
; rewrite {2}r1Er2.
- by left.
by right=> r1Er2; case: (
Rlt_irrefl r1)
; rewrite {1}r1Er2.
Qed.
Definition eqr (
r1 r2 : R)
: bool :=
if Req_EM_T r1 r2 is left _ then true else false.
Lemma eqrP : Equality.axiom eqr.
Proof.
#[hnf] HB.instance Definition _ := hasDecEq.Build R eqrP.
Fact inhR : inhabited R.
Proof.
Definition pickR (
P : pred R) (
n : nat)
:=
let x := epsilon inhR P in if P x then Some x else None.
Fact pickR_some P n x : pickR P n = Some x -> P x.
Proof.
by rewrite /pickR; case: (
boolP (
P _))
=> // Px [<-]. Qed.
Fact pickR_ex (
P : pred R)
:
(
exists x : R, P x)
-> exists n, pickR P n.
Proof.
Fact pickR_ext (
P Q : pred R)
: P =1 Q -> pickR P =1 pickR Q.
Proof.
#[hnf]
HB.instance Definition _ := hasChoice.Build R pickR_some pickR_ex pickR_ext.
Fact RplusA : associative (
Rplus).
Proof.
#[hnf]
HB.instance Definition _ := GRing.isZmodule.Build R
RplusA Rplus_comm Rplus_0_l Rplus_opp_l.
Fact RmultA : associative (
Rmult).
Proof.
Fact R1_neq_0 : R1 != R0.
Proof.
by apply/eqP/R1_neq_R0. Qed.
#[hnf]
HB.instance Definition _ := GRing.Zmodule_isRing.Build R
RmultA Rmult_1_l Rmult_1_r Rmult_plus_distr_r Rmult_plus_distr_l R1_neq_0.
#[hnf]
HB.instance Definition _ := GRing.Ring_hasCommutativeMul.Build R Rmult_comm.
Import Monoid.
HB.instance Definition _ := isComLaw.Build R 0 Rplus
RplusA Rplus_comm Rplus_0_l.
HB.instance Definition _ := isComLaw.Build R 1 Rmult
RmultA Rmult_comm Rmult_1_l.
HB.instance Definition _ := isMulLaw.Build R 0 Rmult Rmult_0_l Rmult_0_r.
HB.instance Definition _ := isAddLaw.Build R Rmult Rplus
Rmult_plus_distr_r Rmult_plus_distr_l.
Definition Rinvx r := if (
r != 0)
then / r else r.
Definition unit_R r := r != 0.
Lemma RmultRinvx : {in unit_R, left_inverse 1 Rinvx Rmult}.
Proof.
move=> r; rewrite -topredE /unit_R /Rinvx => /= rNZ /=.
by rewrite rNZ Rinv_l //; apply/eqP.
Qed.
Lemma RinvxRmult : {in unit_R, right_inverse 1 Rinvx Rmult}.
Proof.
move=> r; rewrite -topredE /unit_R /Rinvx => /= rNZ /=.
by rewrite rNZ Rinv_r //; apply/eqP.
Qed.
Lemma intro_unit_R x y : y * x = 1 /\ x * y = 1 -> unit_R x.
Proof.
Lemma Rinvx_out : {in predC unit_R, Rinvx =1 id}.
Proof.
by move=> x; rewrite inE/= /Rinvx -if_neg => ->. Qed.
#[hnf]
HB.instance Definition _ := GRing.Ring_hasMulInverse.Build R
RmultRinvx RinvxRmult intro_unit_R Rinvx_out.
Lemma R_idomainMixin x y : x * y = 0 -> (
x == 0)
|| (
y == 0).
Proof.
by move=> /Rmult_integral []->; rewrite eqxx ?orbT. Qed.
#[hnf]
HB.instance Definition _ := GRing.ComUnitRing_isIntegral.Build R
R_idomainMixin.
Lemma R_fieldMixin : GRing.field_axiom R
Proof.
by []. Qed.
HB.instance Definition _ := GRing.UnitRing_isField.Build R R_fieldMixin.
Reflect the order on the reals to bool
Definition Rleb r1 r2 := if Rle_dec r1 r2 is left _ then true else false.
Definition Rltb r1 r2 := Rleb r1 r2 && (
r1 != r2).
Definition Rgeb r1 r2 := Rleb r2 r1.
Definition Rgtb r1 r2 := Rltb r2 r1.
Lemma RlebP r1 r2 : reflect (
r1 <= r2) (
Rleb r1 r2).
Proof.
Lemma RltbP r1 r2 : reflect (
r1 < r2) (
Rltb r1 r2).
Proof.
rewrite /Rltb /Rleb; apply: (
iffP idP)
; case: Rle_dec=> //=.
- by case=> // r1Er2 /eqP[].
- by move=> _ r1Lr2; apply/eqP/Rlt_not_eq.
by move=> Nr1Lr2 r1Lr2; case: Nr1Lr2; left.
Qed.
Section ssreal_struct.
Import GRing.Theory.
Import Num.Theory.
Import Num.Def.
Local Open Scope R_scope.
Lemma Rleb_norm_add x y : Rleb (
Rabs (
x + y)) (
Rabs x + Rabs y).
Proof.
by apply/RlebP/Rabs_triang. Qed.
Lemma addr_Rgtb0 x y : Rltb 0 x -> Rltb 0 y -> Rltb 0 (
x + y).
Proof.
by move/RltbP=> Hx /RltbP Hy; apply/RltbP/Rplus_lt_0_compat. Qed.
Lemma Rnorm0_eq0 x : Rabs x = 0 -> x = 0.
Proof.
by move=> H; case: (
x == 0)
/eqP=> // /Rabs_no_R0. Qed.
Lemma Rleb_leVge x y : Rleb 0 x -> Rleb 0 y -> (
Rleb x y)
|| (
Rleb y x).
Proof.
move/RlebP=> Hx /RlebP Hy; case: (
Rlt_le_dec x y).
by move/Rlt_le/RlebP=> ->.
by move/RlebP=> ->; rewrite orbT.
Qed.
Lemma RnormM : {morph Rabs : x y / x * y}.
Proof.
Lemma Rleb_def x y : (
Rleb x y)
= (
Rabs (
y - x)
== y - x).
Proof.
apply/(
sameP (
RlebP x y))
/(
iffP idP)
=> [/eqP H| /Rle_minus H].
apply: Rminus_le; rewrite -Ropp_minus_distr.
apply/Rge_le/Ropp_0_le_ge_contravar.
by rewrite -H; apply: Rabs_pos.
apply/eqP/Rabs_pos_eq.
rewrite -Ropp_minus_distr.
by apply/Ropp_0_ge_le_contravar/Rle_ge.
Qed.
Lemma Rltb_def x y : (
Rltb x y)
= (
y != x)
&& (
Rleb x y).
Proof.
HB.instance Definition _ := Num.IntegralDomain_isNumRing.Build R
Rleb_norm_add addr_Rgtb0 Rnorm0_eq0 Rleb_leVge RnormM Rleb_def Rltb_def.
Lemma RleP : forall x y, reflect (
Rle x y) (
x <= y)
%R.
Proof.
Lemma RltP : forall x y, reflect (
Rlt x y) (
x < y)
%R.
Proof.
Lemma Rreal_axiom (
x : R)
: (
0 <= x)
%R || (
x <= 0)
%R.
Proof.
case: (
Rle_dec 0 x)
=> [/RleP ->|] //.
by move/Rnot_le_lt/Rlt_le/RleP=> ->; rewrite orbT.
Qed.
Lemma R_total : total (
<=%O : rel R).
Proof.
move=> x y; case: (
Rle_lt_dec x y)
=> [/RleP -> //|/Rlt_le/RleP ->];
by rewrite orbT.
Qed.
HB.instance Definition _ := Order.POrder_isTotal.Build _ R R_total.
Lemma Rarchimedean_axiom :
Num.archimedean_axiom [the numDomainType of R : Type].
Proof.
HB.instance Definition _ := Num.RealField_isArchimedean.Build R
Rarchimedean_axiom.
Here are the lemmas that we will use to prove that R has
the rcfType structure.
Lemma continuity_eq f g : f =1 g -> continuity f -> continuity g.
Proof.
move=> Hfg Hf x eps Heps.
have [y [Hy1 Hy2]]:= Hf x eps Heps.
by exists y; split=> // z; rewrite -!Hfg; exact: Hy2.
Qed.
Lemma continuity_sum (
I : finType)
F (
P : pred I)
:
(
forall i, P i -> continuity (
F i))
->
continuity (
fun x => (
\sum_(
i | P i) ((
F i)
x)))
%R.
Proof.
Lemma continuity_exp f n: continuity f -> continuity (
fun x => (
f x)
^+ n)
%R.
Proof.
Lemma Rreal_closed_axiom :
Num.real_closed_axiom [the numDomainType of R : Type].
Proof.
HB.instance Definition _ := Num.RealField_isClosed.Build R Rreal_closed_axiom.
End ssreal_struct.
Local Open Scope ring_scope.
From mathcomp Require Import boolp classical_sets.
Require Import reals.
Section ssreal_struct_contd.
Implicit Type E : set R.
Lemma is_upper_boundE E x : is_upper_bound E x = (
ubound E)
x.
Proof.
rewrite propeqE; split; [move=> h|move=> /ubP h y Ey; exact/RleP/h].
by apply/ubP => y Ey; apply/RleP/h.
Qed.
Lemma boundE E : bound E = has_ubound E.
Proof.
Lemma Rcondcomplete E : has_sup E -> {m | isLub E m}.
Proof.
move=> [E0 uE]; have := completeness E; rewrite boundE => /(
_ uE E0)
[x [E1 E2]].
exists x; split; first by rewrite -is_upper_boundE; apply: E1.
by move=> y; rewrite -is_upper_boundE => /E2/RleP.
Qed.
Lemma Rsupremums_neq0 E : has_sup E -> (
supremums E !=set0)
%classic.
Proof.
by move=> /Rcondcomplete[x [? ?]]; exists x. Qed.
Lemma Rsup_isLub x0 E : has_sup E -> isLub E (
supremum x0 E).
Proof.
Lemma real_sup_adherent x0 E (
eps : R)
: (
0 < eps)
->
has_sup E -> exists2 e, E e & (
supremum x0 E - eps)
< e.
Proof.
Lemma Rsup_ub x0 E : has_sup E -> (
ubound E) (
supremum x0 E).
Proof.
by move=> supE x Ex; apply/ge_supremum_Nmem => //; exact: Rsupremums_neq0.
Qed.
HB.instance Definition _ := ArchimedeanField_isReal.Build R
(
@Rsup_ub (
0 : R)) (
real_sup_adherent 0).
Implicit Types (
x y : R) (
m n : nat).
Lemma expR0 : exp (
0 : R)
= 1.
Proof.
Lemma expRD x y : exp x * exp y = exp (
x + y).
Proof.
Lemma expRX x n : exp x ^+ n = exp (
x *+ n).
Proof.
Lemma sinD x y : sin (
x + y)
= sin x * cos y + cos x * sin y.
Proof.
Lemma cosD x y : cos (
x + y)
= (
cos x * cos y - sin x * sin y).
Proof.
Lemma RplusE x y : Rplus x y = x + y
Proof.
by []. Qed.
Lemma RminusE x y : Rminus x y = x - y
Proof.
by []. Qed.
Lemma RmultE x y : Rmult x y = x * y
Proof.
by []. Qed.
Lemma RoppE x : Ropp x = - x
Proof.
by []. Qed.
Lemma RinvE x : x != 0 -> Rinv x = x^-1.
Proof.
by move=> x_neq0; rewrite -[RHS]/(if _ then _ else _) x_neq0. Qed.
Lemma RdivE x y : y != 0 -> Rdiv x y = x / y.
Proof.
by move=> y_neq0; rewrite /Rdiv RinvE. Qed.
Lemma INRE n : INR n = n%:R.
Proof.
Lemma RsqrtE x : 0 <= x -> sqrt x = Num.sqrt x.
Proof.
Lemma RpowE x n : pow x n = x ^+ n.
Proof.
by elim: n => [ | n In] //=; rewrite exprS In RmultE. Qed.
Lemma RmaxE x y : Rmax x y = Num.max x y.
Proof.
Lemma RminE x y : Rmin x y = Num.min x y.
Proof.
Section bigmaxr.
Context {R : realDomainType}.
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Definition bigmaxr (
r : R)
s := \big[Num.
max/head r s]_(
i <- s)
i.
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Lemma bigmaxr_nil (
x0 : R)
: bigmaxr x0 [::] = x0.
Proof.
by rewrite /bigmaxr /= big_nil. Qed.
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Lemma bigmaxr_un (
x0 x : R)
: bigmaxr x0 [:: x] = x.
Proof.
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Lemma bigmaxrE (
r : R)
s : bigmaxr r s = foldr Num.max (
head r s) (
behead s).
Proof.
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Lemma bigrmax_dflt (
x y : R)
s : Num.max x (
\big[Num.
max/x]_(
j <- y :: s)
j)
=
Num.max x (
\big[Num.
max/y]_(
i <- y :: s)
i).
Proof.
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Lemma bigmaxr_cons (
x0 x y : R)
lr :
bigmaxr x0 (
x :: y :: lr)
= Num.max x (
bigmaxr x0 (
y :: lr)).
Proof.
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Lemma bigmaxr_ler (
x0 : R)
s i :
(
i < size s)
%N -> (
nth x0 s i)
<= (
bigmaxr x0 s).
Proof.
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Lemma bigmaxr_addr (
x0 : R)
lr (
x : R)
:
bigmaxr (
x0 + x) (
map (
fun y : R => y + x)
lr)
= (
bigmaxr x0 lr)
+ x.
Proof.
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Lemma bigmaxr_mem (
x0 : R)
lr : (
0 < size lr)
%N -> bigmaxr x0 lr \in lr.
Proof.
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Lemma bigmaxr_mulr (
A : finType) (
s : seq A) (
k : R) (
x : A -> R)
:
0 <= k -> bigmaxr 0 (
map (
fun i => k * x i)
s)
= k * bigmaxr 0 (
map x s).
Proof.
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Lemma bigmaxr_index (
x0 : R)
lr :
(
0 < size lr)
%N -> (
index (
bigmaxr x0 lr)
lr < size lr)
%N.
Proof.
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Lemma bigmaxr_lerP (
x0 : R)
lr (
x : R)
:
(
0 < size lr)
%N ->
reflect (
forall i, (
i < size lr)
%N -> (
nth x0 lr i)
<= x) ((
bigmaxr x0 lr)
<= x).
Proof.
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Lemma bigmaxr_ltrP (
x0 : R)
lr (
x : R)
:
(
0 < size lr)
%N ->
reflect (
forall i, (
i < size lr)
%N -> (
nth x0 lr i)
< x) ((
bigmaxr x0 lr)
< x).
Proof.
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Lemma bigmaxrP (
x0 : R)
lr (
x : R)
:
(
x \in lr /\ forall i, (
i < size lr)
%N -> (
nth x0 lr i)
<= x)
-> (
bigmaxr x0 lr = x).
Proof.
move=> [] /(
nthP x0)
[] j j_size j_nth x_ler; apply: le_anti; apply/andP; split.
by apply/bigmaxr_lerP => //; apply: (
leq_trans _ j_size).
by rewrite -j_nth (
bigmaxr_ler _ j_size).
Qed.
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Lemma bigmaxr_lerif (
x0 : R)
lr :
uniq lr -> forall i, (
i < size lr)
%N ->
(
nth x0 lr i)
<= (
bigmaxr x0 lr)
?= iff (
i == index (
bigmaxr x0 lr)
lr).
Proof.
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Definition bmaxrf n (
f : {ffun 'I_n.
+1 -> R})
:=
bigmaxr (
f ord0) (
codom f).
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Lemma bmaxrf_ler n (
f : {ffun 'I_n.
+1 -> R})
i :
(
f i)
<= (
bmaxrf f).
Proof.
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Lemma bmaxrf_index n (
f : {ffun 'I_n.
+1 -> R})
:
(
index (
bmaxrf f) (
codom f)
< n.
+1)
%N.
Proof.
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Definition index_bmaxrf n f := Ordinal (
@bmaxrf_index n f).
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Lemma ordnat i n (
ord_i : (
i < n)
%N)
: i = Ordinal ord_i :> nat.
Proof.
by []. Qed.
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Lemma eq_index_bmaxrf n (
f : {ffun 'I_n.
+1 -> R})
:
f (
index_bmaxrf f)
= bmaxrf f.
Proof.
#[deprecated(
note="To be removed. Use topology.v's bigmax/min lemmas instead.")
]
Lemma bmaxrf_lerif n (
f : {ffun 'I_n.
+1 -> R})
:
injective f -> forall i,
(
f i)
<= (
bmaxrf f)
?= iff (
i == index_bmaxrf f).
Proof.
End bigmaxr.
End ssreal_struct_contd.
Require Import signed topology.
Section analysis_struct.
HB.instance Definition _ := PseudoMetric.copy R R^o.
Lemma continuity_pt_nbhs (
f : R -> R)
x :
continuity_pt f x <->
forall eps : {posnum R}, nbhs x (
fun u => `|f u - f x| < eps%:num).
Proof.
split=> [fcont e|fcont _/RltP/posnumP[e]]; last first.
have [_/posnumP[d] xd_fxe] := fcont e.
exists d%:num; split; first by apply/RltP; have := [gt0 of d%:num].
by move=> y [_ /RltP yxd]; apply/RltP/xd_fxe; rewrite /= distrC.
have /RltP egt0 := [gt0 of e%:num].
have [_ [/RltP/posnumP[d] dx_fxe]] := fcont e%:num egt0.
exists d%:num => //= y xyd; case: (
eqVneq x y)
=> [->|xney].
by rewrite subrr normr0.
apply/RltP/dx_fxe; split; first by split=> //; apply/eqP.
by have /RltP := xyd; rewrite distrC.
Qed.
Lemma continuity_pt_cvg (
f : R -> R) (
x : R)
:
continuity_pt f x <-> {for x, continuous f}.
Proof.
eapply iff_trans; first exact: continuity_pt_nbhs.
apply iff_sym.
have FF : Filter (
f @ x)
%classic.
by typeclasses eauto.
case: (
@fcvg_ballP _ _ (
f @ x)
%classic FF (
f x))
=> {FF}H1 H2.
split => [{H2} - /H1 {}H1 eps|{H1} H].
- have {H1} [//|_/posnumP[x0] Hx0] := H1 eps%:num.
exists x0%:num => //= Hx0' /Hx0 /=.
by rewrite /= distrC; apply.
- apply H2 => _ /posnumP[eps]; move: (
H eps)
=> {H} [_ /posnumP[x0] Hx0].
exists x0%:num => //= y /Hx0 /= {}Hx0.
by rewrite /ball /= distrC.
Qed.
Lemma continuity_ptE (
f : R -> R) (
x : R)
:
continuity_pt f x <-> {for x, continuous f}.
Proof.
Local Open Scope classical_set_scope.
Lemma continuity_pt_cvg' f x :
continuity_pt f x <-> f @ x^' --> f x.
Proof.
Lemma continuity_pt_dnbhs f x :
continuity_pt f x <->
forall eps, 0 < eps -> x^' (
fun u => `|f x - f u| < eps).
Proof.
Lemma nbhs_pt_comp (
P : R -> Prop) (
f : R -> R) (
x : R)
:
nbhs (
f x)
P -> continuity_pt f x -> \near x, P (
f x).
Proof.
by move=> Lf /continuity_pt_cvg; apply. Qed.
End analysis_struct.